You should be asking yourself, "What if the whole climate change argument was based on false evidence?" Tony Heller has done a remarkable job of digging into historical records proving, beyond any doubt, that times were hotter in the past when atmospheric CO2 content was considerably lower. This should, at least, cause one to pause and wonder why we're being inundated with almost daily βnewsβ of βscienceβ (theories) of impending apocalypse. Also, consider that nearly all of the "scientific" predictions made in the early 2000s have ππππππ to be false. Proof: "the cogency of evidence that compels acceptance by the mind of a truth or a fact". That's a lot different than "consensus", "theory", or more realistically, "propaganda". Fact is, you cannot prove that CO2 is driving global warming short of replicating the earth and its atmosphere, with all of the complexity, convolutions, and myriad variables in a lab. And that just isn't possible.
Let's assume for a moment that climate change is an artificial construct, as Tony Heller alludes. Who profits? Let's take for example, one Al Gore, who's benefited handily from promoting the theory that humans are driving global warming and sea level rise. Even bought himself a mansion on the California coast, next to the (allegedly) rising ocean. Seems kinda dumb, if he actually believes his predictions. Barack and Michael Obama also bought property right next to the ocean. How many times did we hear Obama warning us about sea levels rising? Who's behind this mantra of calamity (that isn't happening)? Again, "Who profits?". Well, the answer is simple. Just look at the behavior of Joe Biden recently. He's doing everything in his power to curb the usage of fossil fuels. If global warming is a construct, and he probably knows it is (just as Obama and Gore do), then why is he so adamant about selling us on the idea? Well, to answer that, we need to pull back the curtain a little and see who's manipulating the doddering old fool. We all know that politicians can be bought and manipulated into convincing the thought resistant masses to believe anything. I give you m R N A vaccines (which are neither safe, nor are they effective) as an example. Most, throughout the world, actually bought into that experiment without checking into the facts. Fear is a very powerful motivator and marketers know this all too well. So, why are we being made to fear climate change? Particularly, as the evidence that it's a hoax becomes clearer with each passing year. Well, let's go back to the vaccine example... pharmaceutical companies stand to make more than $100 billion dollars selling their experimental potions. So, who profits from selling catastrophic "climate change"? I can think of one example (and there are many).... investors like Tom Steyer who have successfully manipulated governments into buying into the cap and trade BS forcing the working class to pay more for nearly everything. He and his ilk profit mightily in the selling of and investing in "green energy" products.
Digging into the nuts and bolts of this conspiracy is a bit much for me and I will link you to an excellent article on who profits from selling the climate change hoax and green energy products. Meantime, read this article by "science writer" Seth Borenstein (not a scientist) and see if you can detect the obvious attempt to manipulate the reader into a sense of fear. Remember, fear is their way of getting you to abandon reason and go with the consensus or, more accurately, the "narrative".
Caveat Emptor.