PILING ON... WHY?

Why, on earth, would I want continue piling on Fauci? Read on to find out:

To my followers: Some of you might be asking yourselves, “Why is Craig so adamant about piling on Dr. Fauci with all of these negative revelations?” You might be thinking that I have a personal vendetta against the man. I don’t. I hardly know the guy beyond what I’ve read in articles or seen on TV. I am, however, more than aware of human nature and how easily some people can be manipulated into believing a prescribed narrative. Particularly if that narrative comes from “trusted sources”. I’m hardly alone in this... Many great thinkers have been openly skeptical of the “curated narrative” surrounding the origin of COVID-19 and its subsequent (mis)handling by government and the media. My purpose here goes far beyond casting a spotlight on Anthony Fauci’s role in the pandemic and, rather, seeks to point out how the public at large can so easily be manipulated into false (or distorted) beliefs to the extent that they’re persuaded into demonizing one another for differing beliefs despite strong evidence that suggests this “narrative” was curated by certain forces with an agenda.

Let it be known, at this point, that beginning in 2020, I was both alarmed, as were the vast majority of the public, as well as intrigued by the “news” of the growing threat of the SARS-CoV2 virus. Alarmed for obvious reasons, but simultaneously intrigued by the novelty of the threat. I’m nothing if not innately curious and I began to do quite a lot of research. Most of which I’ve chronicled here in: my archives (<click link and search “COVID”) where I’ve compiled more than two dozen articles, most with supporting data, questioning both the extent of as well as the veracity of the “official” information the public was being subjected to. I, along with my fellow skeptics, was forced to conclude that, while certainly threatening, the pandemic was (deliberately?) blown out of proportion. If you’ve been following me from the beginning in September of 2021, when I began this Substack newsletter, you have seen my evidence as well as my reasoning. The more I dug into the evidence and thought it through, the less alarmed I felt about the actual danger pandemic. Particularly, when I analyzed the actual data and compared it to what was being portrayed by the media. My growing alarm, however, was the knowledge that we, the public, were not getting the whole truth and nothing but the truth. “Why?”, I kept asking myself.

Following the recent Senate hearing, where Dr. Fauci repeatedly invoked the 5th Amendment, there’s been a veritable flood of so-called “alternative news” sources that have rightfully observed that the Legacy Media has been suspiciously quiet in covering this important story. Why do I say “important”? Because it brings to light the very legitimate conclusion that I’ve been trying to point out all along… that we, the public, have not been getting the whole story. Information that is vitally important in order for one to draw a plausible conclusion regarding the (mis)handling of the pandemic. If you’ve bothered to peruse my archive, at this point, you can plainly see that something isn’t quite right about what we were told versus what actually occurred during the pandemic. There’s plenty of room for suspicion, if you’ll indulge yourself. One of the many “alternative news” sources that I’ve been following is the: Brownstone Institute where thinkers, far superior to me, have expressed their thought processes in analyzing the available data. One of those thinkers is Jeffrey A. Tucker who I’ve grown to admire as both a thinker and a communicator. He recently wrote a very provocative piece describing his thoughts after reading all 1141 pages of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s (public) diary. It is a sobering look into a man who’s fame and fortune took him to an unenviable place in society. Mr. Tucker writes:

If interested in Jeffrey A. Tucker’s full, insightful article, and I highly recommend it, you can find it: HERE. If you’re like me, and don’t like to read a lot, there’s a handy text to speech converter available. Just click the play button displayed near the top of the article, just below the byline. And, for you true analytical folks wanting to know more about the source upon which Mr. Tucker expounds, Senator Rand Paul has provided the full text of Dr. Fauci’s diary: HERE along with Paul’s commentary (in bold pink) preceding the content from the diary.

So, getting back to the main thrust for my writing this short essay… Again, my intent here has less to do with denigrating Anthony Fauci and more to do with the deliberate and manipulative control of public opinion and the irreparable harm that’s been done to our society. Part of my intent here is to articulate my smoldering anger with the media, the government, but most of all, those of you in the population who were quick to judge me, along with the likes of Aaron Rodgers, Novak Djokovic, Bret Weinstein, Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, and the vast array of “vaccine dissidents” all based on what you were made to believe. No, we’re not “anti-vaxxers”, as the more truculent followers of the Legacy Media might be enticed to characterize us. No, what we are is legitimately skeptical of a narrative that does not measure up to scrutiny. Let us never forget, the damage that was done to our society during the COVID years was significant (intentional?)… building a huge chasm between the loyal followers of the media controlled narrative and those of us who questioned its motives. I, for one, will never trust the media or my government to provide me with the whole truth and nothing but the truth so long as they are vulnerable to “special interests”. Particularly in the absence of real checks and balances. Frankly, I’m surprised it’s taken this long for the truth to leak out and begin to permeate the mainstream reality… especially thanks to courageous people, like those I’ve mentioned, for doggedly pursuing the truth. And, I want to leave you with a thought to ponder, if the Legacy Media been wrong with their reporting of the past 6 years, what incentive do they have to correct this wrong? Perhaps, more importantly, how could honest journalists allow this to happen? See yesterday’s essay from Patsy Reed for more on that: “WE DO NOT HAVE ANYTHING RESEMBLING A FUNCTIONAL FOURTH ESTATED”

Think about all of this as you watch the following video (try not to puke):