WHY DOES THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION CONSISTENTLY AND CONSPICUOUSLY TRADUCE THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE COUNTRY THAT IT GOVERNS?
Ruminations by: Patricia Reed
I am weary of saying to myself, “Golly gee, that's a head scratcher!” So I'm going to put in my ten cents' worth of speculation. I attempt here to examine logical probabilities in the hope of accelerating an honest discussion (already ongoing in some quarters) that will assist the American public in awakening from its apparent coma before it's too late.
Let's start by acknowledging that the present administration is astoundingly consistent: Every major and minor policy choice that it makes—from the absence of a southern border, to the presence of a state-controlled media, to defunded local police and defanged military troops, to overfunded woke Karens and overfanged tax collectors, to bribing public schools to foment racism, and bribing hospitals to overmedicate, mutilate, and kill people—one could go on forever--is patently conducive to the destruction of the United States as a sovereign entity.
Not to mince words, the BA commits treason every morning before breakfast and continues to commit it all day, most days, until bedtime.
Now, every significant private or governmental entity in the world has a primary loyalty to some power center either within or without its own borders. Historically, the loyalty of all American citizens is supposed to be to the US Constitution. All holders of high office take an oath of loyalty to that Constitution upon assuming office.
In order to underscore their sincerity and wholeheartedness, they traditionally put their hand on something which symbolizes the ultimate moral code by which they profess to live; for most American officeholders, that symbol has traditionally been the Bible, although it's my understanding that this is not required. One could conceivably use a Koran or some formulation of humanist principles. (Or perhaps even assert egotistically that "I am all I need.")
It is doubtful that Das Kapital or Mein Kampf could be so used because of their glaringly obvious incompatibility with much of the US Constitution. Many people believe that the Koran is likewise incompatible, but this does not seem to be a settled issue.
Could a president destroy the country as a functioning sovereign entity without actually violating the Constitution? Perhaps theoretically in his or her early stages of that enterprise, he or she could manage to do that, but before long a strong and lawful opposition would assert itself, and he would be unable to vanquish that opposition without violating the Constitution. So the question is presumed to be theoretical.
The BA is not loyal to the United States either in the Constitutional sense or in the practical, everyday sense of maintaining the country's capacity to act in a sovereign manner as it sees fit. So the BA must be loyal to some non-Constitutional center of power, either internal or external. In short, it is surely in thrall to a hostile power-- either foreign or domestic.
Who are the most likely foreign candidates? Communist China is the “favorite” here for reasons both obvious and numerous. CCP is a totalitarian socialist ethnostate: both totalitarianism and ethno-statism (a form of racist/ethnic supremacy) are antithetical to our Constitution as well as most of our history and traditions; socialism is antithetical to our capitalist economic system as well.
So CCP is a hostile power, and a powerful power. It is a foe to be reckoned with under any circumstances. (Other Marxist countries such as Russia and North Korea are perhaps nearly as hostile but not nearly as powerful.)
Unfortunately, in addition to that, the Biden family is in an especially weak position in relation to the CCP. One reason is that they owe much of their wealth to the CCP, and it's now payback time. Payback time will presumably last as long as Joe Biden has any political power.
Secondly, the CCP is notorious for spying on people to gather “dirt” on them, then using such “dirt” to blackmail the miscreants. The opportunities for blackmail which Hunter Biden's moral turpitude offer to anyone who might be interested in said blackmail-- are prodigious. He is a living, breathing blackmailer's jackpot-- a gift that never stops giving.
So yeah, China. Big time.
Does China exhaust the possibilities? No, there are other hostile and formidable countries such as Iran and Pakistan. There are also individuals and nongovernmental entities so rich and powerful that they amount to being the equivalent of countries, and some of them do not have the best interests of the USA at heart-- to put it mildly.
An example of such an individual would be George Soros, whose ill-gotten money controls huge segments of the Democratic Party. An example of such a nongovernmental entity would be the World Economic Forum, which for all practical purposes owns most of America's investment banks and pension funds.
So there are multiple domestic power centers inside the US who have economic and/or ideological interests antithetical to the best interests of the US, because these power centers—who range from Soros to Walmart to Blackrock to the National Basketball Association to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to the pharmaceutical industry to prominent factions in both political parties, etc.—are compromised by their economic interests, which conflict with the interests (both short and long term)-- of other Americans.
Then there is the continuing influence of Barack Obama.
The “Biden” White House is mostly staffed by former Obama staffers. Like the Obamas, they are products of America's elite institutions such as its “best” colleges and its “best” employers—the big banks, the big consultants, the big media, the big law firms. They all share a smug contempt for the dirt-stained and petroleum-stained hands that feed them. They don't like uppity American truck drivers. They don't even like uppity American farmers.
They believe that “futuristic” entities like the World Economic Forum promise a gleamingly sanitized, smooth-surfaced life wherein they (the elites) can enjoy the fruits of the labors of those dirt and oil stained non-elite hands, without having to actually come in contact with such deplorables (and certainly not with their grubby, noisy urchins). The elites look forward to a future in which they will flit from continent to continent (somehow managing nevertheless to not aggravate climate change), from French soirees to the glittering shopping malls of the emirates.
Meanwhile, the dirty-handed serfs will “own nothing and be happy”. Well, happy enough. And if they are not happy enough, too bad. They will be under 24-hour surveillance and won't be able to do a damn thing about it. (The Bill of Rights will be a distant memory.)
So the US has no shortage of foes both foreign and domestic. Unfortunately, in the last two years, America's foreign foes and domestic insurrectionists—real ones, not the fake ones-- seem to have converged.
They were greatly aided by the economic and cultural collapse brought about by a carefully managed/manipulated pandemic. (Just as predicted by a number of prescient people like Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.) In any case, they have now apparently flowed together into one big happy river of sedition and subversion.
So there we are. We are not in a good place. Can we get out of it? I do not know. I leave it to older and wiser heads. Oops, older is almost off the table. Wiser?
I fervently hope “wiser” is out there somewhere. Ready and waiting to make its move.....